antennagroup.com

When Congress returns to Capitol Hill from its two week recess next week, it’s expected to tackle the energy bill in earnest. A major provision in the bill that could drastically increase growth in the renewable energy sector is the concept of a national renewable portfolio standard, or RPS. The RPS tactic has been successful in 28 states in creating a market for renewable energy, and if the U.S. is serious about building a carbon neutral economy and reducing global warming, a national RPS is not only necessary, it is vital.

Essentially, an RPS requires utilities to purchase a percentage of the energy they provide to customers from renewable sources.  The current energy bill making its way through Congress eases into the process by starting the renewable energy requirement at 6% in 2012 and increasing it steadily over the next decade. The schedule is as follows:
More than half of U.S. states already have RPS requirements of their own and this national schedule would not override those state provisions. In fact, many states today are already meeting the 6% standard proposed for 2012, and in some cases, far exceeding it. What may rustle some feathers among utilities in states without current RPS mandates is the swift progression of the proposed schedule. Moving from 6% to 11% in four years might be tough for states not already in the renewable energy game, especially in the midst of a major economic downturn.

Despite the growing pains associated with a national RPS, it is a requirement for a healthy renewable energy market in the U.S. Across all sectors, from solar to wind to biomass, the renewable energy industry has gained significant market traction, despite inconsistent federal support. But with a national RPS in place the U.S. government can provide the stability the industry needs to achieve economies of scale and mass adoption, which are critical to bringing the costs of renewable energy down and achieving grid parity, the point at which the price of electricity generated by renewable sources is equal to or cheaper than grid power.

The renewable energy industry will still experience growth without a national RPS, but it will be slower.  If America is serious about reducing its use of fossil fuels, it should set benchmarks to meet its goals.

Green jobs have been a particularly hot topic of late, especially in today’s conversations about job creation through the recently passed stimulus bill.  But what is a green job?  Truth is, no one really knows, and the jury is still out in the definition debate.  From a PR perspective, the lack of a definition creates challenges for those wishing to promote green jobs.  Having a clear understanding of what does and does not qualify as green is critical for making strategic outreach decisions.  Companies participating in green job conversations risk making fraudulent claims in an environment where definition changes rapidly.  Understanding the dynamics of the green jobs story may help companies avoid damaging relationships with key stakeholders and audiences.

Many are attempting to reign in this debate and come up with definitions that are general enough to be all-encompassing, but specific enough to be credible.  Critics point out that a lack of what constitutes a green job allows questionable businesses and industries to claim green job creds and potentially greenwash their activities.  This has some of us out there asking, will green jobs become the new greenwash?

Some argue that everyone is too caught up in defining green jobs and instead should just be focusing on creating good jobs, while others feel that only the narrowest definition will suffice to avoid greenwashing.  Kevin Doyle’s two part post at Grist on his findings and reactions from the Good Jobs, Green Jobs conference recently held in Pittsburgh, reveals that current definitions of green jobs focus primarily on jobs in clean energy and efficient green buildings.  Within these areas, specifically jobs in manufacturing and building trades seems to be agreed upon to be the greenest of the green.  But surely there are more green jobs out there than this definition offers us.

Here is my favorite definition so far from the UN’s Green Jobs Report:
“We define green jobs as work in agricultural, manufacturing, research and development (R&D), administrative, and service activities that contribute substantially to preserving or restoring environmental quality. Specifically, but not exclusively, this includes jobs that help to protect ecosystems and biodiversity; reduce energy, materials, and water consumption through high-efficiency strategies; de-carbonize the economy; and minimize or altogether avoid generation of all forms of waste and pollution.”

Until a definition that is both broad enough to be inclusive, yet narrow enough to avoid greenwashing is agreed upon, companies will be reluctant to publicize their green job offerings for fear of public backlash.  Arguably, if the US is to truly shift to a green economy, then all jobs will be green jobs, but until we get there, it is important to understand the definition debate when reaching out to media around your company’s green job opportunities.

While I’m not the world’s biggest fan of “Extreme Makeover: Home Edition,” I can appreciate the benefits the show provides for a variety of deserving families, as well as the boost a product can receive from being featured on it. So when I heard one of my clients, Akeena Solar, would be providing a featured solar system to a family in Southern California that was being highlighted on the show, I started getting excited. What could be better for a solar company than a little celebrity endorsement from none other than the well-tanned, well-groomed Ty Pennington with the well-spiked hair?

When I first heard the news a few months ago, the episode wasn’t set to air until the end of March. Immediately, Akeena crews hustled down to San Bernardino to install the system in what amounted to a matter of hours. It was then that I started paying a bit more attention to the show: nearly every weekend the builders featured a new green building element—bamboo floors, eco-friendly paint, energy efficient appliances, and lots and lots of solar systems. And each time the green element was explained, it seemed to become more and more…well, normal, to feature these types of products. They look great and are environmentally friendly, the designers said. They are quality products with real cost-savings benefits, the builders said. They just made sense, Ty said.

Installing Akeena's Andalay Solar Panels

Had going green become mainstream?

For a while, my public relations team was able to rely on the uniqueness of solar when pitching the media. We could leverage the story of that kooky family down the block who installed a solar system, watched their meter spin backwards and never paid the electric company more than $12. But that was because not everyone had a solar system; people weren’t accustomed to seeing silicon panels popping up on rooftops everywhere. Fast-forward a few months, and solar—while not reaching the point of widespread adoption by any means—is no longer unfamiliar. Journalists tell me that the latest installation isn’t big enough, it isn’t sexy enough, and it’s something they’ve already covered. During those lonely hours watching late-night television, green suddenly begins to work its way into the vocabulary of infomercials and QVC. And green guides everywhere are popping up telling consumers how to shop.

It’s still a long road for green products to be the default choice in consumer’s brains. But with millions of viewers tuning in each weekend to see how easily green elements can be incorporated into homes, it’s going to get a lot easier to be green.